Target Deals: Garnier Hair Care As Low As 42 Cents Each

There are so many deals to snag at Target right now with the new $5 off $20 mobile coupon good in the beauty department.

If you haven't sorted out a deal scenario for yourself yet, here's a great idea on Garnier hair care.  After coupons and price match, you could stock up for as low as 42 cents each.

That's at least 85% off or more on the regular shelf price!

Here's how the math works out:

  • Garnier Hair Care -- assorted varieties priced from $2.99 to $3.49 each.
  • If you find the $2.99 price, buy three bottles plus four bottles of Vidal Sassoon (priced at $3.99 each) for a pre-coupon total of $21.94.
  • Use your $5 off $20 Target mobile coupon (if you don't have it yet, text BEAUTY to 827438 to get yours.)
  • That knocks your price down to $16.94.
  • Next, use three $2 off Garnier coupons from the 5/4 Smartsource insert, along with four $2 off Vidal Sassoon coupons from the 4/13 Smartsource insert.
  • Your final price is $2.94 for all seven bottles -- so just 42 cents each!

If you find the $3.49 price point on Garnier, try this deal:
  • Buy four bottles of Garnier plus two bottles of Vidal Sassoon for a pre-coupon total of $21.94. 
  • Give your $5 off $20 Target mobile coupon first, and then four $2 off coupons from the 5/4 Smartsource insert, plus two $2 off Vidal Sassoon coupons from the 4/13 Smartsource insert.
  • Your final price drops to $4.94 for six bottles, or 82 cents apiece.  Still an excellent price!
Remember, you can mix and match cosmetics, fragrance, skin care, and hair care with this Target coupon, so I recommend bringing ALL your coupons along with you to the store to see what other great deals you can put together.

Also, note that Target.com has full size bottles of Garnier priced at $2.99, so you can always price match the website.  Just keep in mind that many stores will only honor the price match for one item -- not all six or seven bottles.

Big thanks to Nina for helping me piece this deal together this afternoon -- and Vanes for helping me catch the error in the original post! :D

Comments